Concise argument

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The concise argument.

What do doctors think? The close and dynamic relationship between medical ethics and medical practice is shown to be alive and well in this month’s issue, with three papers that examine various aspects of clinical practice and the attitudes of the medical profession. A study by F A Miller and colleagues examines the attitudes of healthcare practitioners towards disclosure of incidental findings...

متن کامل

A concise argument: on the wrongness of killing.

In this issue, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and Franklin G. Miller (see page 3, Editor ’s choice) argue that what makes killing wrong, when it is wrong, is not that it ends life, but that it causes complete and irreversible disability—what they call total disability. They hold that the wrongness of killing should be explained by reference to the harm that killing causes to the person who dies. And ...

متن کامل

Argument or no argument ?

We will call such adjuncts instances of the X or no X construction It was suggested in the middle 1980s by Alexis Manaster-Ramer that well-formed instances of X or no X involve a string X of unbounded length preceding or no, with an exact copy following (for a brief allusion to it in print, see Manaster-Ramer 1986). This claim has received hardly any discussion at all in the subsequent literatu...

متن کامل

Concise Anatomy

591 last reprinting of the book appeared in 1920. Hence, as Professor Wright says in his Editorial Note, there was need to make it available "to be read by all students of physiology and to be re-read by their teachers and by mature investigators in the field." Of the contents of the book there is little for the modern reviewer to say-it stands wholly on its own proven merits. It is difficult f...

متن کامل

The Doomsday Argument and the Simulation Argument

The Doomsday Argument and the Simulation Argument share certain structural features, and hence are often discussed together (Bostrom 2003, Are you living in a computer simulation, Philosophical Quarterly, 53:243–255; Aranyosi 2004, The Doomsday Simulation Argument. Or why isn’t the end nigh, and you’re not living in a simulation, http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/190/; Richmond 2008, Doomsday, Bi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Medical Ethics

سال: 2017

ISSN: 0306-6800,1473-4257

DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104194